So this woman wants to marry a corporation.
I'm curious, just how loony do women have to behave before we get to repeal the suffrage laws?
Because as we are forced to indulge this stupidity, it is not going to abate, they will simply raise the stakes to the point where they will demand the right to scream incoherently while shooting at random strangers.
You can't expect women to reign in their own behavior. Women by their very nature lack the powers of judgement that virtually all men have as a birthright. A topic I plan to expand on soon enough.
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Monday, January 31, 2011
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
The Mythical Female Orgasm
The Myth of the Female Orgasm
Someday, a long time from now, historians and sociologists will look back on the 20th century and scratch their heads over the “sexual revolution” that began. Of course, assuming the collapse of society doesn’t breed a new era of book burning, they will have ample material to analyze though it may not ultimately explain how feminists were able to convince themselves that their libidos were at least the equal of men. Of course, as with all of their deranged claims, when the proof fails to manifest, they blame men.
The claim is laughable and can easily be machine gunned down by the following bullet points culled from the best source of truth - reality:
* Men view sex as an end, women view sex as a means
* Men need little or no prompting for sex, you would have an easier time talking a woman into buying a new car.
* When men orgasm, there is demonstrable proof. With a woman, you must take her word for it.
* When men fail to be aroused it is invariably physical in nature. When women are incapable of faking arousal, it is usually in her head (where it would have ample leg room).
* Prostitutes are women who sell themselves for sex and can be found around the world. Gigalos are men who sell themselves for sex and are slightly less common than Bigfoot.
* For a man to get off, all he needs is a tissue, his hand and a few minutes. Women however require a vast array of machines with more RPM’s than a lawnmower and most of an hour - if she’s in a hurry.
Needless to say, any woman who mentions her legendary sex drive should be laughed at. This kind of claim is on par with a third world communist nation calling itself great when it’s not even discovered the concept of paved roads. The vestigial response to sexual stimulation that women experience is the equivalent of the nipples on men. They are an genetic holdover from men and women sharing the same racial gene pool. I imagine some of you will insist that there are indeed some women who genuinely do enjoy and crave sex. So what? Apparently some men can lactate too.
Someday, a long time from now, historians and sociologists will look back on the 20th century and scratch their heads over the “sexual revolution” that began. Of course, assuming the collapse of society doesn’t breed a new era of book burning, they will have ample material to analyze though it may not ultimately explain how feminists were able to convince themselves that their libidos were at least the equal of men. Of course, as with all of their deranged claims, when the proof fails to manifest, they blame men.
The claim is laughable and can easily be machine gunned down by the following bullet points culled from the best source of truth - reality:
* Men view sex as an end, women view sex as a means
* Men need little or no prompting for sex, you would have an easier time talking a woman into buying a new car.
* When men orgasm, there is demonstrable proof. With a woman, you must take her word for it.
* When men fail to be aroused it is invariably physical in nature. When women are incapable of faking arousal, it is usually in her head (where it would have ample leg room).
* Prostitutes are women who sell themselves for sex and can be found around the world. Gigalos are men who sell themselves for sex and are slightly less common than Bigfoot.
* For a man to get off, all he needs is a tissue, his hand and a few minutes. Women however require a vast array of machines with more RPM’s than a lawnmower and most of an hour - if she’s in a hurry.
Needless to say, any woman who mentions her legendary sex drive should be laughed at. This kind of claim is on par with a third world communist nation calling itself great when it’s not even discovered the concept of paved roads. The vestigial response to sexual stimulation that women experience is the equivalent of the nipples on men. They are an genetic holdover from men and women sharing the same racial gene pool. I imagine some of you will insist that there are indeed some women who genuinely do enjoy and crave sex. So what? Apparently some men can lactate too.
Monday, April 7, 2008
Customer Service - A Case Study
There was a time, long ago, when companies were large enough to be staffed by customer service departments decided they would staff their positions with women. This was based on the misleading research that showed that women tended to elicit more positive responses from those who had were having problems or needed assistance. This is one of those situations where the kunts took a grain of data and ran rough shod over reality. The greater experience, that women have never failed to ruin any industry they have graced, was ignored because as we all know, feelings will always trump reality in a kunt’s mind.
This is the origin of the much deserved bad reputation of “Customer Service”. You might ask how this conclusion is reached? If you are a woman, don’t bother, logic is an elusive concept so no degree of explanation will suffice. If you are a man however I only need one elegant reason: When a man is faced with a problem, it is his gut reaction to correct the problem. It is this innate quality of man that leads to things like science, capitalism and technology. When a woman is faced with a problem, her gut reaction is to figure out how best to avoid it or put it off to somebody else.
This is bad enough when the women are merely occupying the phones and front desks, but women ever leave well enough alone and once they infiltrated the successive levels of their departments, you wind up with a hierarchy of useless staff who’s only talent is in blowing off customers. This of course suits the corporations just fine, because if customers leave without having to be satisfied that’s money the company didn’t have to spend to rectify the problem.
This is the origin of the much deserved bad reputation of “Customer Service”. You might ask how this conclusion is reached? If you are a woman, don’t bother, logic is an elusive concept so no degree of explanation will suffice. If you are a man however I only need one elegant reason: When a man is faced with a problem, it is his gut reaction to correct the problem. It is this innate quality of man that leads to things like science, capitalism and technology. When a woman is faced with a problem, her gut reaction is to figure out how best to avoid it or put it off to somebody else.
This is bad enough when the women are merely occupying the phones and front desks, but women ever leave well enough alone and once they infiltrated the successive levels of their departments, you wind up with a hierarchy of useless staff who’s only talent is in blowing off customers. This of course suits the corporations just fine, because if customers leave without having to be satisfied that’s money the company didn’t have to spend to rectify the problem.
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Where Nature Went Wrong
There are those who would blame Feminism for the behavior of women. I am not one of them. There are those who believe that women behave as they due because of bad socialization or gender stereotyping. I am not one of them. The reasons for why women are what they are, is not the fault of men (or even Feminists, though they do make it worse).
Nature has given women something of a shitty genetic hand to play. The brain of a woman is at best slightly below average that of a man and quite often is seriously lacking. Women have by genetic predisposition bad social skills which are only made worse by poor social skills. Compound these external problems with internal ones like a hormone imbalance that makes peace of mind a stranger and something as simple as an orgasm is often heard about but never personally experienced.
Now put this group around another, this other group, though wildly varied (in contrast) of intellect and talents will on average achieve things they never will. Boys will discover orgasms long before girls will get their first period. As they grow into men, they will find their passions either in art, in science. They will become poets, painters, philosophers, thinkers, scientists, or leaders. Women will go shopping. Yes, some women have the capacity to rise above the crippling flaws of their genetics but they are the rare exception to a disturbingly pathetic rule and even they are tainted as they walk through life gritting their teeth at the men who so seem to do effortlessly what is a major struggle for themselves.
So what of the rule then? What do you do when you are so obviously outclassed and outgunned in this modern market place? Well, any good tactician would you that the answer is simple - you wage a guerrilla war. When you lack strength, impugn strength. When you lack intelligence, speak derisively of intellect. When your neighbor has a nice house, you sabotage it. This is why women will instinctively create misery and suffering where there was no need for it. They are jealous of men, not for their achievements but because they are men. This is the heart of misandry, women feel collectively cheated by nature and they are taking it out on men like a hateful petty sibling.
Nature has given women something of a shitty genetic hand to play. The brain of a woman is at best slightly below average that of a man and quite often is seriously lacking. Women have by genetic predisposition bad social skills which are only made worse by poor social skills. Compound these external problems with internal ones like a hormone imbalance that makes peace of mind a stranger and something as simple as an orgasm is often heard about but never personally experienced.
Now put this group around another, this other group, though wildly varied (in contrast) of intellect and talents will on average achieve things they never will. Boys will discover orgasms long before girls will get their first period. As they grow into men, they will find their passions either in art, in science. They will become poets, painters, philosophers, thinkers, scientists, or leaders. Women will go shopping. Yes, some women have the capacity to rise above the crippling flaws of their genetics but they are the rare exception to a disturbingly pathetic rule and even they are tainted as they walk through life gritting their teeth at the men who so seem to do effortlessly what is a major struggle for themselves.
So what of the rule then? What do you do when you are so obviously outclassed and outgunned in this modern market place? Well, any good tactician would you that the answer is simple - you wage a guerrilla war. When you lack strength, impugn strength. When you lack intelligence, speak derisively of intellect. When your neighbor has a nice house, you sabotage it. This is why women will instinctively create misery and suffering where there was no need for it. They are jealous of men, not for their achievements but because they are men. This is the heart of misandry, women feel collectively cheated by nature and they are taking it out on men like a hateful petty sibling.
Saturday, March 22, 2008
When a girl says “No” she means whatever the hell she feels like.
In Muslim dominated countries, a woman’s testimony is only half that of a man. Now apart from the legal strangeness of giving a numerical valuation to a legal claim, I think that for once the religious nuts have a great idea at least in concept. The root of this I surmise is that the testimony of a woman can’t be trusted. This of course is a bit of male wisdom that transcends every culture and nation. It can be found in the oldest scriptures and this wisdom though disputed by every woman has never once been refuted.
Of course the questions arise, are women incapable of telling the truth? No that would mean that women are simply pathological liars which isn’t the case. Others claim that women would prefer to tell a lie because it’s more comfortable than the truth. This is closer but the reality, as it is so often, is more complicated.
The basic problem is that in the mind of a woman, the truth or a lie has equal merit. She will use the truth if it would gain her benefit (or inflict more harm) and she will tell a lie if it will reach those ends better. For a woman, there is no more moral conflict in telling a lie over the truth than there would be in choosing between orange soda and grape soda.
The ramification of this flaw in the behavior of women becomes obvious when one considers how unreliable the opinion of a woman can be. When they stand for nothing (which is impossible when you do not value the truth over deceit) their beliefs become as difficult to nail down as a mayfly. Think about all the times when women simply can’t make up their minds, regardless of the obviousness of a choice, be it a choice of great magnitude or something as simple as what to wear to work. All choices are made on a foundation of valuations which on some level have the labels of “right” and “wrong.”
So it’s not surprising that Muslims would treat the testimony of a woman with suspicion, though their reasoning is almost certainly not as sound, like the idiot who gets the answer to a question correctly by a blind guess, the answer though is still correct - women are dishonest by nature.
Of course the questions arise, are women incapable of telling the truth? No that would mean that women are simply pathological liars which isn’t the case. Others claim that women would prefer to tell a lie because it’s more comfortable than the truth. This is closer but the reality, as it is so often, is more complicated.
The basic problem is that in the mind of a woman, the truth or a lie has equal merit. She will use the truth if it would gain her benefit (or inflict more harm) and she will tell a lie if it will reach those ends better. For a woman, there is no more moral conflict in telling a lie over the truth than there would be in choosing between orange soda and grape soda.
The ramification of this flaw in the behavior of women becomes obvious when one considers how unreliable the opinion of a woman can be. When they stand for nothing (which is impossible when you do not value the truth over deceit) their beliefs become as difficult to nail down as a mayfly. Think about all the times when women simply can’t make up their minds, regardless of the obviousness of a choice, be it a choice of great magnitude or something as simple as what to wear to work. All choices are made on a foundation of valuations which on some level have the labels of “right” and “wrong.”
So it’s not surprising that Muslims would treat the testimony of a woman with suspicion, though their reasoning is almost certainly not as sound, like the idiot who gets the answer to a question correctly by a blind guess, the answer though is still correct - women are dishonest by nature.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Men Are The Better Communicators
One of many popular myths feminists and psuedo-scientists love to toss around is that women are better at communication than men. Amazing how the gender notorious for the phrase "I don't want to talk about it" can get away with claiming to be our betters in what man clearly is a master at.
Let's gleefully tear apart this moronic bit of propaganda:
TEST SCORES: Boys routinely outscore girls in the SAT verbal. Despite the increasingly hostile environment boys must suffer in school this has yet. The solution? That's obvious, when you are incompetent a level playing field isn't good enough, it must be slanted in your favor!
LITERATURE: Just for the sake of argument, let's ignore everything written up until 1950 when typewriters were available in the western world and quite affordable. Despite that, the overwhelming majority of authors are men. The majority of journalists are men. What few female writers that have appeared over the years have usually tackled the same subjects such as shopping, how to make themselves pretty and how much they loathe and despise men. For the record, there have been a few exceptions. Ayn Rand and Marie Shelley come to mind, but of course such women are snubbed by their own gender. Notice how often you see "author" and "feminist author" used interchangably among them.
ART: This is even worse than literature, though pop-culture has definately allowed for a small group of semi-talanted women to flourish largely on the coattails of their gender. However just with literature they will never produce a great master with anywhere near the regularity of men even if they somehow overcame the poor communication problem. Why? Because women can't bear being criticized and any artist will tell you that it goes with the trade. However I have found one perverse form of art where women have found a niche - the graphic arts. You know the people who tweak photos and throw together the ads that now paper every surface now. However this isn't because women have become marginally better at getting ideas across, it's because this field of 'art' is by comparison very regimented and formulaic.
ARCHITECTURE: Coming from three generations of architects and designers, I have no hesitation in including this. So without resorting to google or wikipedia - can you even name a female architect?
So why are women so miserably bad at getting an idea across? I would put forth the basic problem is that language in particular is built on conceptual foundations. Words have meanings and meanings are intended to be rigid concepts which is in direct opposition to the innate psyche of women. Women want the vague and amorphous, they want things to mean what they want them to mean and the result is they denude themselves of the very tools to get their point across.
They love to say there are "other ways" to communicate, body language being one of their favorites. However, this claim is at best bullshit, because unless you are proficient in sign language, odds are you are not going to do much communicating with your body. Though it does appear women are more capable of discerning cues from body language, this is more along the lines of how blind people have more acute hearing. By disdaining language they had to learn something else. However I would also point this out: lower animals are also more perceptive of body language, but how many books have they written?
Let's gleefully tear apart this moronic bit of propaganda:
TEST SCORES: Boys routinely outscore girls in the SAT verbal. Despite the increasingly hostile environment boys must suffer in school this has yet. The solution? That's obvious, when you are incompetent a level playing field isn't good enough, it must be slanted in your favor!
LITERATURE: Just for the sake of argument, let's ignore everything written up until 1950 when typewriters were available in the western world and quite affordable. Despite that, the overwhelming majority of authors are men. The majority of journalists are men. What few female writers that have appeared over the years have usually tackled the same subjects such as shopping, how to make themselves pretty and how much they loathe and despise men. For the record, there have been a few exceptions. Ayn Rand and Marie Shelley come to mind, but of course such women are snubbed by their own gender. Notice how often you see "author" and "feminist author" used interchangably among them.
ART: This is even worse than literature, though pop-culture has definately allowed for a small group of semi-talanted women to flourish largely on the coattails of their gender. However just with literature they will never produce a great master with anywhere near the regularity of men even if they somehow overcame the poor communication problem. Why? Because women can't bear being criticized and any artist will tell you that it goes with the trade. However I have found one perverse form of art where women have found a niche - the graphic arts. You know the people who tweak photos and throw together the ads that now paper every surface now. However this isn't because women have become marginally better at getting ideas across, it's because this field of 'art' is by comparison very regimented and formulaic.
ARCHITECTURE: Coming from three generations of architects and designers, I have no hesitation in including this. So without resorting to google or wikipedia - can you even name a female architect?
So why are women so miserably bad at getting an idea across? I would put forth the basic problem is that language in particular is built on conceptual foundations. Words have meanings and meanings are intended to be rigid concepts which is in direct opposition to the innate psyche of women. Women want the vague and amorphous, they want things to mean what they want them to mean and the result is they denude themselves of the very tools to get their point across.
They love to say there are "other ways" to communicate, body language being one of their favorites. However, this claim is at best bullshit, because unless you are proficient in sign language, odds are you are not going to do much communicating with your body. Though it does appear women are more capable of discerning cues from body language, this is more along the lines of how blind people have more acute hearing. By disdaining language they had to learn something else. However I would also point this out: lower animals are also more perceptive of body language, but how many books have they written?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)