I thought I'd check Google and see if my blog was showing up yet and low and behold I find this!
Now quick, before she realizes men are looking at her blathering and takes it down! According to her we men who refuse to bleed our lives into her wallet are "More than likely they are 40 year old virgins" which shouldn't surprise anybody. The typical hate speech that women resort to any time reality chafes against their delusions.
I would love to remind this kunt that feminists for years swore that marriage was enslavement and no woman in her right mind should want it. However as these little cretins grew up and found they loved shopping but were growing to detest the idea of work, it was inevitable they would turn to marriage to finance their spending sprees. Of course as no-fault divorce became the law of the land, the kunts realized that they could have your cake and as well as their own. So now we have come full circle, but one thing has never changed - it's all about them.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Men Are The Better Communicators
One of many popular myths feminists and psuedo-scientists love to toss around is that women are better at communication than men. Amazing how the gender notorious for the phrase "I don't want to talk about it" can get away with claiming to be our betters in what man clearly is a master at.
Let's gleefully tear apart this moronic bit of propaganda:
TEST SCORES: Boys routinely outscore girls in the SAT verbal. Despite the increasingly hostile environment boys must suffer in school this has yet. The solution? That's obvious, when you are incompetent a level playing field isn't good enough, it must be slanted in your favor!
LITERATURE: Just for the sake of argument, let's ignore everything written up until 1950 when typewriters were available in the western world and quite affordable. Despite that, the overwhelming majority of authors are men. The majority of journalists are men. What few female writers that have appeared over the years have usually tackled the same subjects such as shopping, how to make themselves pretty and how much they loathe and despise men. For the record, there have been a few exceptions. Ayn Rand and Marie Shelley come to mind, but of course such women are snubbed by their own gender. Notice how often you see "author" and "feminist author" used interchangably among them.
ART: This is even worse than literature, though pop-culture has definately allowed for a small group of semi-talanted women to flourish largely on the coattails of their gender. However just with literature they will never produce a great master with anywhere near the regularity of men even if they somehow overcame the poor communication problem. Why? Because women can't bear being criticized and any artist will tell you that it goes with the trade. However I have found one perverse form of art where women have found a niche - the graphic arts. You know the people who tweak photos and throw together the ads that now paper every surface now. However this isn't because women have become marginally better at getting ideas across, it's because this field of 'art' is by comparison very regimented and formulaic.
ARCHITECTURE: Coming from three generations of architects and designers, I have no hesitation in including this. So without resorting to google or wikipedia - can you even name a female architect?
So why are women so miserably bad at getting an idea across? I would put forth the basic problem is that language in particular is built on conceptual foundations. Words have meanings and meanings are intended to be rigid concepts which is in direct opposition to the innate psyche of women. Women want the vague and amorphous, they want things to mean what they want them to mean and the result is they denude themselves of the very tools to get their point across.
They love to say there are "other ways" to communicate, body language being one of their favorites. However, this claim is at best bullshit, because unless you are proficient in sign language, odds are you are not going to do much communicating with your body. Though it does appear women are more capable of discerning cues from body language, this is more along the lines of how blind people have more acute hearing. By disdaining language they had to learn something else. However I would also point this out: lower animals are also more perceptive of body language, but how many books have they written?
Let's gleefully tear apart this moronic bit of propaganda:
TEST SCORES: Boys routinely outscore girls in the SAT verbal. Despite the increasingly hostile environment boys must suffer in school this has yet. The solution? That's obvious, when you are incompetent a level playing field isn't good enough, it must be slanted in your favor!
LITERATURE: Just for the sake of argument, let's ignore everything written up until 1950 when typewriters were available in the western world and quite affordable. Despite that, the overwhelming majority of authors are men. The majority of journalists are men. What few female writers that have appeared over the years have usually tackled the same subjects such as shopping, how to make themselves pretty and how much they loathe and despise men. For the record, there have been a few exceptions. Ayn Rand and Marie Shelley come to mind, but of course such women are snubbed by their own gender. Notice how often you see "author" and "feminist author" used interchangably among them.
ART: This is even worse than literature, though pop-culture has definately allowed for a small group of semi-talanted women to flourish largely on the coattails of their gender. However just with literature they will never produce a great master with anywhere near the regularity of men even if they somehow overcame the poor communication problem. Why? Because women can't bear being criticized and any artist will tell you that it goes with the trade. However I have found one perverse form of art where women have found a niche - the graphic arts. You know the people who tweak photos and throw together the ads that now paper every surface now. However this isn't because women have become marginally better at getting ideas across, it's because this field of 'art' is by comparison very regimented and formulaic.
ARCHITECTURE: Coming from three generations of architects and designers, I have no hesitation in including this. So without resorting to google or wikipedia - can you even name a female architect?
So why are women so miserably bad at getting an idea across? I would put forth the basic problem is that language in particular is built on conceptual foundations. Words have meanings and meanings are intended to be rigid concepts which is in direct opposition to the innate psyche of women. Women want the vague and amorphous, they want things to mean what they want them to mean and the result is they denude themselves of the very tools to get their point across.
They love to say there are "other ways" to communicate, body language being one of their favorites. However, this claim is at best bullshit, because unless you are proficient in sign language, odds are you are not going to do much communicating with your body. Though it does appear women are more capable of discerning cues from body language, this is more along the lines of how blind people have more acute hearing. By disdaining language they had to learn something else. However I would also point this out: lower animals are also more perceptive of body language, but how many books have they written?
Friday, November 23, 2007
How Feminism Liberated Men
One of the most simple yet profound lessons we consistently fail to learn is that our actions have consequences beyond what we anticipate. Sometimes the consequences turn out to be completely counter to those of the original. Feminism is one such case though I am amazed how men have not caught on to this fact.
Feminists claimed their goals were to 'liberate' women from the 'oppressive regime' of being kept in homes and forced to be the unpaid slaves and breeders of men. They painted the working man as living in some paradise where he lounged in the office and then went home to his slaving wife. While men were not at all interested in indulging a movement based on this deranged fantasy, they did not put up anything like the resistance feminists would have their daughters think they were forced to struggle against. The prime motive in this social change was economics, which actually pushed us away from this momentary bubble of idealism and back to the historic norm. Yes guys read your history, women quite often worked hard labor jobs outside the home. However when women got out into the workplace, much to their dismay they learned it wasn't all gumdrops and unicorns! It was hard! Now, in hypocritical arrogance they are trying to push this shellacked 50's fantasy on us, only now they want us to foot the bill AND absolve them of any 'wifely duties' as well. The immigrant labor we are expected to hire will presumably take care of that.
The supreme irony is Feminists did what women would have otherwise never done individually. They gave voice to what all women felt and believed, that had neither the desire for men, and that being with men was merely a means to an end. They spoke as openly and honestly as any woman could, that they hated men, and that the only sex they would bear was with each other. They made it clear that children were a burden, and their only purpose was to be a hostage to the men they would cheerfully divorce for no reason at all. Everything men ever suspected women were guilty of Feminists cheerfully admitted to and insisted that they do it with pride.
Feminists claimed their goals were to 'liberate' women from the 'oppressive regime' of being kept in homes and forced to be the unpaid slaves and breeders of men. They painted the working man as living in some paradise where he lounged in the office and then went home to his slaving wife. While men were not at all interested in indulging a movement based on this deranged fantasy, they did not put up anything like the resistance feminists would have their daughters think they were forced to struggle against. The prime motive in this social change was economics, which actually pushed us away from this momentary bubble of idealism and back to the historic norm. Yes guys read your history, women quite often worked hard labor jobs outside the home. However when women got out into the workplace, much to their dismay they learned it wasn't all gumdrops and unicorns! It was hard! Now, in hypocritical arrogance they are trying to push this shellacked 50's fantasy on us, only now they want us to foot the bill AND absolve them of any 'wifely duties' as well. The immigrant labor we are expected to hire will presumably take care of that.
Guys on the other hand are jumping ship in record numbers, abandoning the concept of even metaphorical unions (live in lovers, cohabitation, etc) as they have realized that a woman's true daydream is to be a size 18 leech. In giving up the illusion of control, they have gained the reality of being free. Women are now living in the nightmare of getting everything they ever asked for. They have their careers, they have their own place, and with each year that goes by it's likely they will never be burdened with children.
The supreme irony is Feminists did what women would have otherwise never done individually. They gave voice to what all women felt and believed, that had neither the desire for men, and that being with men was merely a means to an end. They spoke as openly and honestly as any woman could, that they hated men, and that the only sex they would bear was with each other. They made it clear that children were a burden, and their only purpose was to be a hostage to the men they would cheerfully divorce for no reason at all. Everything men ever suspected women were guilty of Feminists cheerfully admitted to and insisted that they do it with pride.
Is it any wonder that so many women now are intent on distancing themselves from Feminism? Much like how modern politicians who were once members of hate groups are desperate to insist we should read nothing into it. The taint is on them and it's not coming off. We're free and no amount of sweet talking is going to make us put our shackles back on.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
We have a long road ahead.
The marriage strike is just the beginning. Like globalization or climate change, the marriage strike is not an easily tracked phenomena and the decline of marriage is merely the first symptoms of the conflict to come. Within the next few years, as the decline of marriages becomes too obvious for the media to continue ignoring it, there will be the usual spin doctors in the media who will eagerly depict this negatively as possible. Men will be portrayed as selfish, antisocial or even traitorous to browbeat them back into the slavery that is the marriage/divorce cycle.
This will not be resolved in a scant few years. This is a crusade which will take a generation and likely longer to truly bring to a proper conclusion. An entire generation of men have been beaten spiritually and emotionally. They have been condemned as criminals for the 'crime' of not being women. An entire generation of women have been raised to think of themselves as princesses. If history has shown us anything, once people assume a throne, it takes a revolution to remove them.
This is not a strike. This is a revolution.
This will not be resolved in a scant few years. This is a crusade which will take a generation and likely longer to truly bring to a proper conclusion. An entire generation of men have been beaten spiritually and emotionally. They have been condemned as criminals for the 'crime' of not being women. An entire generation of women have been raised to think of themselves as princesses. If history has shown us anything, once people assume a throne, it takes a revolution to remove them.
This is not a strike. This is a revolution.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)